Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Defendants’ motion was denied by the Court. The link below is the Opposition filed by plaintiffs’ attorneys to a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Sunset’s and Gilvarry’s attorneys. (*) The Court will note that despite the fact that Gilvarry denies ordering the custody, Defendants admit in their motion for summary judgment that he ordered the detention. In an attempt to further shift blame, Gonzales points the finger at Gilvarry. G, Security Report, Emerson Voluntary Statement. Conversely, security shift supervisor David Clark and security officer Joseph Emerson point the finger at surveillance agent Jose Gonzales and Gilvarry.

Gilvarry points the finger at his supervisor, Alida Del Fonte for the arrest.(*) See Exh. Gilvarry tried to place the blame on others: Plaintiffs’ attorneys named Shift Manager Vinny Gilvarry as an individual defendant. Plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote, “This is a case about a failure to take responsibility.” After dragging the case out until just before jury trial, Sunset Station eventually privately settled with the two patrons involved (there is no indication that they were advantage players). Sunset Station’s false imprisonment of two “good casino customers” The industry would save itself millions of dollars by avoiding most of the lawsuits and other problems detailed on this page. It would be good if casino security always followed the common sense approach suggested by Mr. Eject, Evict, Trespass and 86, by Alan W.

Nevada casino sueveillance union